Automation Efficiency

    This is a process of software testing where the basic features and following test steps as running, initialization, executing, analyzing and issuing result, performed automatically with tools produced for automated testing.

    If bugs are detected, improvements keep launching until the result fits perfectly, although there are moments when no errors happening even from the first stage.

Major assets:
• High-level of operation speed. Frees up time for research testing and exploring complex tasks.
• Human factor absence. Reduces the number of errors and fuel confidence that all written tests will be executed the same way.
• Effective performance improvement. Automatic reporting contributes to fast defect defining.
An indispensable instrument for speeding up the introduction of new functionality that promotes increasing of users activity.

Automation vs Manual

Not a special hardware base but a team of qualified specialists is a ticket to success for both testing methods. Technologically, automation is quite more complex in usage than manual testing, but it’s not entirely appropriate to be implemented everywhere.
If pay attention only to basic characteristics, there might appear the wrong conclusion about manual testing would be fine for small projects and the automation fits well large projects. In reality, these conclusions mean nothing since each project is a specific way of creating unique art. Thus, there is no answer to what is better or what is not.

At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet gubergren no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ipsumlor eut consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt labore et dolore magna liquyam erat.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing esed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna.

Get In Touch

At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet gubergren no sea takimata. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing esed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna.

sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ipsumlor eut consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt labore et dolore magna liquyam erat.

Get In Touch

However, there is a general outline of what we base our choice.
It all depends on:
• Project complexity. There is no need to automate simply-based system because of software budget and simplicity of functionality.
• Deadlines. As a rule, we recommend manual testing for short-term projects. Autotests are more applicable to long-term projects.
• Financial resources. Kind of testing selects in accordance with the profitable for the customer difference between the costs of testing and the benefits that the product will bring after release.

We propose and justify the most convenient type of testing after taking into account customer’s wishes and requirements, including provided product and all the constituent elements for its implementation.

Got interested in
cooperation?

90

PROJECTS
COMPLITED

120

HAPPY
CLIENTS

20

OUR
EXPERTS

Subscribe on news about QASpace

Subscribe to receive the beneficial newsletters from our QASpace team